[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dave Benjamin <dave@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Easier FFI |
Jon Harrop wrote: > For example, why can't we have a generic FFI library that allows us to use any > external library (unsafely) without leaving OCaml? Then we could write or > generate our bindings entirely in OCaml and forget about these C stubs. I would love something like this. I've used "ctypes", a similar library for Python, a few times, and it has really come in handy. Not something I want to use often (at least not directly), but for those times when use of an unsupported C library is necessary, it's so nice to have the ability to stay within the language rather than writing a bunch of wrapper code. I wonder if something like ctypes would translate well to a statically typed language like OCaml. http://starship.python.net/crew/theller/ctypes/