-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On the contrary.  I am an application-minded subscriber and find the current 
discussions extremely relevant.  How OCaml will be managed/distributed and 
how OCaml's package management system will be setup has a big impact on how I 
do my work.

But fork to another list if it pleases you.  I will follow the discussion 
where ever it is.

Peng

On Wednesday 30 January 2008 08:38:42 am Thomas Fischbacher wrote:
> Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> >>Considering the noticeable increase in traffic on this list which does
> >>not seem to be about to decline, may I suggest splitting it into
> >>caml-impl (dealing with language implementation issues only) and
> >>caml-list?
> >
> > yes, it was so much better when that was dead (!)
>
> Frankly, there is a lot of pointless noise on the list at present
> that is of no interest at all to application-minded subscribers.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHoIyWfIRcEFL/JewRAkiDAJ0Yx4nD7DpLDc+3qOfJ6cwqf6Ux+gCdFWuI
w3BS6qCw8ttjcLPSR1WSzCg=
=y2M4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----