Browse thread
[OSR] Caml Community Code
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | blue storm <bluestorm.dylc@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Caml Community Code |
Sylvain Le Gall has announced at the meeting that he would provide a server with basic development tools. I think it would be pertinent to host such projects there. (Moreover, sourceforge is not free, baah :p ) But I don't know how his server-building is going. More generally, I totally agree on the "get things done" idea. I'm willing to help in the camlp4 area. A common place for up-to-date camlp4 extensions (akin to what martin jambon provides for ocaml <= 3.09) would be a very good thing. On 1/31/08, Jonathan Bryant <watersofmemory@gmail.com> wrote: > List, > > Despite all the great ideas on the [OSR] threads, we seem to be getting > nowhere and talking ourselves to death bickering about implementation > details of code that hasn't even been written yet. I think the only thing > we can agree on is that tools for use by the community should be written by > the community. Because of that, we need to start writing them: the best way > to find out what works is to try. > > I've created a SourceForge project called Caml Community Code here ( > http://sourceforge.net/projects/camlcode) where we can put any code for > community OCaml tools. The fact that we can't hack the OCaml language > itself (due to French copyright law) seems to have unfortunately caused the > community to not hack together on other tools _for_ the language. With this > project everyone can hack on the tools we'll (hopefully) end up using every > day, rather than having INRIA or one person try to build something that > satisfies everyone. If you have code for tools (I know someone at least has > some code for a package manager), please put it in the repository so we can > all see and work on it _as as community_. > > Regarding the package manager discussion, what we need is a few functioning > prototypes. Later we can go back and cherry pick features we like and merge > them down to just two to develop a little more, and finally pick one. I > also think we should have one CamlP4 grammar with all the community's agreed > upon "standard" syntax extensions (sort of a "new revised" syntax?), a set > of "standard" ocamlbuild plugins, and "standard" interfaces (XML parser, > etc.), all of which can be stored in the project as well. > > I was waiting for the project to get approved before sending this out (it > just came through this morning), so I'll go ahead and make a temporary > directory layout. > > --Jonathan >