Browse thread
[OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@l...> |
| Subject: | Re: [OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process |
On 27-01-2008, Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hallo, > >> As I have mentioned in my previous message, during the OCaml Developer >> Days, the INRIA team has made clear that, among other things, the >> community is essentially in charge of recommending best practices, >> standards, etc. A candidate name has been suggested: "OSR", for "OCaml >> Standard Recommandations." > > I'm looking forward to hearing more about the results from yesterday's > meeting (are there minutes?). In any case, the OSR seems like a very > reasonable process. > > I'll start with one thorn: the Unicode situation. Everyone plus their > mother defines some custom Unicode module. ExtLib has one, Camomile > has obviously a few, Ocamlnet has its own thing, etc, etc. It would make > sense to have instead a fairly simple "Unicode" package that defined the > basic data type, and then have all these libs use that one. I bet this > was discussed yesterday -- what was the conclusion? > You can already read every presentations on the website (.pdf and .odp). At one time in the future, i will also put the video of every talks somewhere (YouTube?) and a link on the wiki page. http://wiki.cocan.org/events/europe/ocamlmeetingparis2008 Regards, Sylvain Le Gall