Browse thread
[OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Francois Pottier <Francois.Pottier@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] OCaml Standard Recommandation Process |
Hello, On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:43:55PM +0000, Dario Teixeira wrote: > Another example that is probably so obvious that it almost doesn't need > mentioning is the incompatibility of the lexer interface between ulex > and Ocamlyacc/Menhir. It would be possible for menhir to follow dypgen and allow the parser to be parameterized over a lexer signature. I'll add that to the todo list. In the meantime, another possibility would be to write a stub function that makes ulex (or whatever lexer you are using) artificially look like an ocamllex lexer. If I am not mistaken, all that is needed is to provide a function of type Lexing.lexbuf -> token, which must update the fields lex_start_p and lex_curr_p as a side effect. -- François Pottier Francois.Pottier@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~fpottier/