Browse thread
requests for improvement
-
ivan chollet
- Oliver Bandel
-
ketti
- michael.le_barbier@l...
-
Richard Jones
- Hezekiah M. Carty
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Hezekiah M. Carty <hcarty@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] requests for improvement |
On Jan 22, 2008 2:44 PM, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:43:36PM +0100, ketti wrote: > > 2008/1/20 ivan chollet <ivan.chollet@laposte.net>: > > > - Any plans about giving the possibility to spread the definition > > > across more than one source file. Sometimes modules are more than 300 lines, > > > so I would like to be able to split it over two or more files. Currently > > > there is a one-to-one relationship between files and modules. As far as I > > > know, OCaml is the only language to have such a particular constraint. > > > > I think this is a non issue. > > Just split it in several modules and use 'include' to bring it all > > together. Is that any different from what you want? > > Or keep the source in a single file and use a folding editor. > Any suggestions for a folding editor for OCaml? I've been using emacs + tuareg + some sort of outline mode for emacs. vim can at least do indentation-based folding, but its auto-indent tends to act quite badly for me and vim + omlet gets very slow for .ml files longer than a few hundred lines. -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science