Browse thread
Hash clash in polymorphic variants
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Hash clash in polymorphic variants |
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 03:34:54 Yaron Minsky wrote: > We started out doing entirely back-end processes using OCaml, but as time > went on, we started building more and more GUIs. The fact that OCaml has > lablgtk makes it much more useful for us, without a doubt. The main reason > we like to do GUIs in OCaml is that we see a lot of value in sharing type > definitions and code between the GUIs and the back-end services they > connect to. Yes, this is exactly the kind of thing I was referring to. I think a lot of people want simple GUIs that are perfectly feasible to construct entirely in OCaml and the overhead of splitting a project across languages is much higher. Fortunately, LablGTK makes this feasible in OCaml. There must be some reason why LablGTK is so popular! ;-) -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e