Browse thread
Shared run-time DLLs for commerce
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Shared run-time DLLs for commerce |
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 19:39:04 Christophe TROESTLER wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:17:31 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > FWIW it would also save a lot of time and effort for maintainers of > > OCaml-related software in (binary-based) GNU/Linux distributions, as > > Debian and Red Hat. > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:03:51 +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > > This is certainly true. The single, brittle digest is a real problem > > for Red Hat. It should be at least possible to add additional values > > and types without that causing incompatibility. > > Why don't you guys discuss exactly what kind of robustness you need > and introduce a feature wish in the bug tracker? Of course, the package maintainers could always simply remove the digest test from their own OCaml package and hope for the best. ;-) -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e