Browse thread
On module distribution
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Maxence Guesdon <maxence.guesdon@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: On module distribution |
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:56:13 -0800 Vlad Skvortsov <vss@73rus.com> wrote: > Bünzli Daniel wrote: > > Le 15 janv. 08 ŕ 14:38, Berke Durak a écrit : > > > >> I think we should rather add to Ocamlbuild a module for calling > >> ocamlfind, parsing its output, etc. This way ocamlbuild plugins could > >> easily call ocamlfind, be it for configuration or compilation. > > > > My problem with ocamlfind is that it takes too much control over me. > > Also it doesn't help you with the tedious publishing aspect (which I > > try to mitigate by using news feeds) and it won't help you with the > > binary update problem. > > > > Le 15 janv. 08 ŕ 16:07, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit : > > > >> Unfortunately, a decentralized system has also several drawbacks: > > [...] > > > > Yes of course. But the point is that we already have a decentralized > > system. All these tarballs that are referenced from the hump and not > > part of godi. My aim is to be able to quickly install or publish such > > decentralized bits. Currently these two tasks take too much time: > > using them, because everyone does it its own way, publishing them, > > because you have to devise your own way (make a readme, think about > > how to structure the tarball how to manage releases, announce on the > > mailing list, etc.). The idea is to simplify all this uninteresting > > business to entice people to share their modules. Lowering the bar may > > mean a decrease in quality but in the end good modules and reliable > > publishers will be identified by the community. > > > > Also note that the proposal in itself doesn't prevent the development > > of a more authoritative, centralized and stable source of packages. > > I've just started with OCaml, and my immediate perception was that > modules and libraries are quite hard to find. This is due to several > factors, one being that the web interface for Hump doesn't allow complex > searches and stuff, doesn't offer RSS to keep track of updates, etc. There is an RSS channel on this page: http://caml.inria.fr/resources/index.en.html in the hump box on the right. The url of the channel is: http://caml.inria.fr/hump.rss Regards, Maxence Guesdon