Zitat von Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>:

> I was hoping there would be some follow up discussion on the code
> below, but
> haven't seen anything yet.
[...]

I just read your mail...
..and it's late .... chrrzzz...


...but if I'm not completely sleepy this looks like a bug. :-(

It behaves like if s would be defined on top of the
module, but it is  local constructed in the function f.
Look sstrange... I have the same behaviour here (Debians
OCaml here is 3.09.2, and I have tried with toplevel, bytecode
and naticecode).

=> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs



Ciao,
   Oliver