On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:00:01 Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> Users  that  consider  darcs  broken and/or unusable are not darcs users,
> they perhaps  tried  it, that's all.

So you have not personally experienced performance problems with darcs.

> IMHO  they've  applied  the  "correction  before  optimization"  principle.
> A principle that we often spread in functional programming community.

If darcs is unusably slow then its theoretical correctness is irrelevant. 
Regardless, its actual correctness is still in question because it has so few 
users that it is basically untested software.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e