Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Strange performances
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strange performances
From: "Till Varoquaux" <>
> On Jan 18, 2008 2:15 AM, Jacques Garrigue <> wrote:
> ...
> > By the way, on my machine your version doesn't even work in native
> > code, I only get segfaults. This is allowed behaviour for
> > out-of-bounds access.
> Could you please clarify? This seems a little scary to me, I thought
> segfaults where acceptable only when you used unsafe features (or ran
> out of stack).

This is why I sent an erratum. The cause for the segfault was not the
array access, but the stack overflow, which occured due to ocaml's
peculiar evaluation order.
Still, I maintain that intentionally raising and catching out-of-bound
accesses is not good programming style...

Jacques Garrigue