Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2008-01-22 (14:06)
From: Loup Vaillant <loup.vaillant@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4
2008/1/22, Nicolas Pouillard <>:
> Excerpts from christian.sternagel's message of Tue Jan 22 14:33:55 +0100
> > I deduce that there is no standard way of introducing
> > `fresh' (w.r.t. the abstract syntax tree) variables
> > within a camlp4 syntax extension? Wouldn't that be nice? =)
> That  would be nice, but doing it cleanly would require a large amount of work
> and user visible changes.


I am personally interested in how we "do it cleanly" (not specifically
for Ocaml), but I didn't found much documentation nor papers on the
subject. Do anyone have some pointers about that?