Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management
-
Bünzli_Daniel
- David Teller
- David Teller
-
David Teller
- Bünzli_Daniel
- Till Varoquaux
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Bünzli_Daniel <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management |
Le 11 févr. 08 à 09:12, David Teller a écrit : > I've re-read the candidate and I have one suggestion: at the moment, > you > want to standardize both `Success and `Error and use `Error to carry > further results. Why not trim-down slightly this recommandation and > standardize only `Success (or the more concise `Ok, as suggested by > Yaron) ? Actually the initial version did exactly this. I changed it because some commented that they wanted a clear case for the error. But if most agree with you I'm willing to change it back. Best, Daniel