Browse thread
[OSR] Ports-like package management system
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: [OSR] Ports-like package management system |
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:22:59PM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > On 13-02-2008, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Berke Durak wrote: > >> It is not, but while we try to figure out what a reasonable system might be, > >> if you can set up a permanent repository for Ocaml code, that would > >> be already quite useful! Most links on the Humps are dead. For instance, > >> I can't find a copy of Baire. > > > > Exactly ... And the lesson here is that this tarball repository must > > be mirrored around the world. There are existing mirrors who will do > > this for you, but they won't mirror anything that isn't flat files > > accessible by rsync. > > > > Don't start again the SCM thread. This is useless. For now there will be > an access through FTP. I think it is fully acceptable to also have a > rsync access, but i need to check this with my host provided. OVH > specify that their dedicated servers should not be used for mirroring > except... (if you subscribe to an option AFAIK) I wasn't talking about SCM :-) Here's the University of Kent's policy on mirroring: http://www.mirrorservice.org/Help/FeedBack/Mirror and some here: http://www.mirrorservice.org/Help/Contact_Us They'll mirror from HTTP or FTP too, but I suspect they prefer rsync. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat