Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | michaelgrunewald@y... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management |
Bünzli Daniel <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> writes:
>> time jot 1000000 | ./in.native
>
> real 0m4.814s
> user 0m4.371s
> sys 0m0.218s
You are timing `jot' aren't you?
>> time jot 1000000 | ./inb.native
>
> real 0m4.790s
> user 0m4.355s
> sys 0m0.217s
The recommendation you proposed would be even more useful if it
emphasizes when ``Exceptionless error management'' is adequate. You
can rewrite last sentence of first paragraph
``The following points suggest that raising exceptions to signal
unexceptional error cases is not a good idea.''
like this:
``Let's enumerate situations where raising exceptions to signal
unexceptional error cases is not a good idea.''
Maybe would you also suppress the `bad' in the first sentence, since
it is `bad' with regard to the situations you are enumerating.
--
Michaël