Browse thread
Now it's faster (addendum to "Performance-question")
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Now it's faster (addendum to "Performance-question") |
I was answering Vincent Hanquez who seemed to have ideas wrt Buffer. Cheers, David On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:03 +0100, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Do you mean the buffer module should be made better or do you think, > the "^" operator should be implemented differently? > If Buffer-module might be even faster, when it's changed, > that's fine, but IMHO it's quite fast. -- David Teller Security of Distributed Systems http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.