Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management, take 2
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Teller <David.Teller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management, take 2 |
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 20:29 +0100, Bünzli Daniel wrote:
> At the risk of repeating myself, if Pervasives defines a plain variant
> ('a, 'b) may_fail = Success of 'a | Error of 'b, I don't care about
> polymorphic variants. The thing is that for now I don't want to depend
> on hypothetical improvements to the standard library performed outside
> the scope of the base distribution. Take 1 allows this, take 2 doesn't
> allow it.
Indeed. As I mentioned in another post, I'm quite interested into
getting these "hypothetical improvements to the standard library
performed outside the scope of the base distribution" to take off.
Two different conceptions of what needs to be fixed. Anyway, it's out of
our hands now.
Cheers,
David
--
David Teller
Security of Distributed Systems
http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.