Browse thread
Re: large hash tables
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alain Frisch <alain@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: large hash tables |
David Allsopp wrote: > resizing, even it means that the resizing is potentially slower (a slower > version could always be used if the buckets are detected to be huge or in > response to a caught Stack_overflow - though that could prove tricky). The detection of Stack_overflow does not work well for all the supported systems. A library should not assume that the exception will be raised properly. -- Alain