Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Frédéric_van_der_Plancke <fvdp@d...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management
Bünzli Daniel wrote:
> Still I think this is a little bit sad. Using polymorphic variants 
> isn't that bad at all as long as we just use the following _closed_ 
> type [ `Value of  ... | `Error of ... ]. This would allow us to move 
> forward despite that fact that Pervasives is frozen (and no I'm not 
> interested in forking it).
But Pervasives is not *that* frozen. If I understand things well, the 
main concern of Inria is having to maintain the would-be additions and 
changes to Pervasives. An Ok | Error variant doesn't look like it will 
entail heavy maintenance charges. So they may accept to add it.

(I don't think there are backwards-compatibility problems either as 
user-defined Ok|Error would hide a Pervasives-defined one in all 
contexts I can think of.)

Frédéric