Browse thread
type unsoundness with constraints and polymorphic variants
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christopher L Conway <cconway@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] type unsoundness with constraints and polymorphic variants |
On Feb 13, 2008 9:53 AM, Mattias Engdegård <mattias@virtutech.se> wrote: > >I would be very impressed if a student managed to write a full formal > >semantic in a summer. > > So would most people, but we may be missing the goal. A solid > understanding of the language for serious programming or even > independent reimplementation does not necessarily require formal > semantics. A careful prose description would probably do. A careful prose description is what I intended to propose. A true formal semantics is neither necessary nor sufficient. Chris