Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management, take 2
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | rlehy@f... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management, take 2 |
Selon Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org>: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 12:17:29AM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > > And [polymorphic variants] _cannot_ pollute any namespace, > > since they define nothing. > they "pollute" since the polymorphic variant namespace is flat, and > don't interact with module (on purpose obviously) Could you please expand on this "pollution" and the *practical* problems it causes? I can see the risk of my own identifiers clashing with those of a library, and that finding documentation when the namespace is flat is harder. But none of these seem applicable for polymorphic variants, so I feel like I'm missing something. -- Ronan