Browse thread
Calendar library: version 2.0
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Calendar library: version 2.0 |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:38:48PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Richard Jones a écrit : > > It's much better to call them Calendar_utils and Calendar_version > > (note: underscore _not_ period). > > Could you elaborate on this? In brief, using an underscore leaves the space open. If I have a package called: Net.FTP then no one else independently can create a package called Net or Net.Telnet (or Net.anything else). However if I create a package called: Net_FTP then an independent person can come along and make: Net_Telnet Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat