Browse thread
Fine-grained types with more general library
- Dawid Toton
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dawid Toton <dawid.toton@u...> |
| Subject: | Fine-grained types with more general library |
I have a type (e.g. of path to file) type path = string list and many operations (e.g. path manipulation). Then I need to have two kinds of paths (e.g. local and remote) and want type system to enforce proper usage (some functions act on remote paths only etc.). So I create new two types: type remote_t = Remote path type local_t = Local path Then I avoid using type path for greater safety. But I have a problem: can't use path manipulation library on these new types. I have created "mirror" versions of the library for each new type, but this made my source code unmaintainable. What is the right solution? I'd prefer not to contaminate the path library with things specific to this particular problem, since it's reused. Dawid