Browse thread
[OSR] Exceptionless error management
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | tab@s... |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Exceptionless error management |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:31:52PM +0100, Bünzli Daniel wrote: > On the safety bit I think this is less true if you actually take care to > close your variants. However I tend to agree on the clearer separation of > cases. I added a request for comments on this at the end of the OSR page to > standardize on [ `Value of ... | `Error of ... ] instead of [ `Value of ... > | .... ]. but what's wrong with the plain [ Value of ... | Error of ... ] variant instead of polymorphic variant ? -- Vincent Hanquez