Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
build, distribution, data and metadata
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Aleksey Nogin <nogin@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] build, distribution, data and metadata
On 29.01.2008 09:56, Bünzli Daniel wrote:

>>   I know there is Omake,
> 
> Having used ocamlbuild for caml projects, for me it is out of question
> to return to something make-like.

On 31.01.2008 01:28, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:

>> - the make files are written in a well defined language
> Considering GNU make, BSD make, pmake, bmake, omake... I would say no.

IMHO it would be improper to consider OMake as being make-like and group
it together with various make variants. While some very basic elements
of OMake syntax are made to resemble make in order to facilitate
learning OMake for those familiar with make, but in most respects it is
a lot closer to, say, ocamlbuild than to make.

Of course, this is just a biased opinion of an OMake co-author ;-)

Aleksey