Browse thread
Categories for types
- Michaël_Grünewald
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Michaël_Grünewald <michael.grunewald@l...> |
| Subject: | Categories for types |
Dear OCaml folks, I am an happy OCaml amateur programmer since many years now, and I ever wondered why the language has ``functors'' --- I was puzzled by the name. My curiosity had a renewal when I found this book in the math department library: Categories for types, by Crole. Before checking the book out, I would like to know if the term ``functor'' was chosen because they are actually functors. Maybe someone can also suggests other readings to me. (I have a strong math education, although I am not used to work with categories.) -- Cheers, Michaël