Thanks. And what exactly is the point of that ? Making an abstract type
concrete ?

Cheers,
 David

On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 23:51 +0100, Olivier Andrieu wrote:
> I believe that's for type definitions with both an equation and a
> representation, like:
> 
>   type complex = Complex.t = {
>     re : float ;
>     im : float ;
>   }
> 
-- 
David Teller
 Security of Distributed Systems
  http://www.univ-orleans.fr/lifo/Members/David.Teller
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.