> Topic for discussion: without prejudice for those cases where an
> alternative name may be far more suitable, it would be nice if
> packages of this type containing a single syntax extension were to
> agree on a common name for the subpackage defining that extension.
> Some possibilities are "extension", "pa", "pp", etc.

If it doesn't break anything, I suggest "syntax".

-- 
Eric Cooper             e c c @ c m u . e d u