Browse thread
what's in the future for ocamlbuild?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vincent Hanquez <tab@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: what's in the future for ocamlbuild? |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:59:40PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:31:36AM +0000, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > > I don't think INRIA team are against accepting your patches, if it > > fits correctly in OCaml. > > I was under the impression that they had a policy to keep the wole > copyright under INRIA hands, so that Caml consortium members could get > OCaml BSD licenses, and INRIA can do whatever it wishes in the future. > > That's rather contrary to accepting patches without paperwork > (copyright assignment and all that). I don't believe INRIA accepts copyright assignment; rationale is, AFAIR, that it's might not be legal in France. -- Vincent.