Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries |
I propose adding the "and" syntax to open_in: open X and Y in ... On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:55 PM, David Teller > <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr> wrote: > > > > I believe we souldn't live without open_in > > I add my vote for open_in. >