Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
I propose adding the "and" syntax to open_in:

open X and Y in ...

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Paolo Donadeo <p.donadeo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:55 PM, David Teller
>  <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr> wrote:
>
>
> > I believe we souldn't live without open_in
>
>  I add my vote for open_in.
>