Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-03-05 (15:44) |
From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries |
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 06:12:19PM +0100, Berke Durak wrote: > The idea is to define, as part of the OSR process, a list of > "standard" syntax extensions and libraries. Even though the whole thread seems to be syntax extension -oriented, I had from this short sentence that you were interested in libraries as well. On the basis of this assumption I really would like to see the "batteries included" distribution to come with ExtLib in it and, really important, open-ed by default. That is, when I use List.map in my programs I want that List.map to be the one from ExtLib rather than the usual, non-tail recursive version. Similarly, I want to be able to use new functions defined in ExtList as they were in List without the need to open anything. Actually, I was going to mock up by myself a proof of concept distribution of OCaml with extlib build during the build process and some hacks to open it by default. But given that you've started this thread I guess the efforts should be better merged. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? zack@{upsilon.cc,cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -<%>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time