Browse thread
Canonical Set/Map datastructure?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-03-07 (10:19) |
From: | Alain Frisch <alain@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Canonical Set/Map datastructure? |
Berke Durak wrote: > However, the idea of combining hash-consing and Patricia trees, however > elegant, does not suit my problem. Basically, you are cheating by using > an auxiliary data structure, the hashtable (which is also O(n^2) > worst-case). You can also implement hash-consing with the Map module (or a polymorphic version of it) to avoid the worst case complexity. But yes, you need an extra data structure. -- Alain