Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-03-04 (17:50) |
From: | Hezekiah M. Carty <hcarty@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries |
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Berke Durak <berke.durak@exalead.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > David Teller suggested that I launch a thread on my suggestion at the end of the > "different records, same field name?" thread. > > The idea is to define, as part of the OSR process, a list of > "standard" syntax extensions and libraries. A meta-distribution of Ocaml would > then include, for every element of the ocaml toolchain, a version that has > access to those extensions and libraries. The name of the extended tool would > be obtained by adding an "s" to the original name. > > Hence, assuming that we agree that Alain Frisch's openin and, say, Pcre should > be part of the standard, then > > ocamlcs (resp. ocamlopts) > > would be a script calling ocamlc (resp. ocamlopt) with options > > -I +pcre -pp pa_openin > > Then we'd tell people new to Ocaml to use those instead; the existing users > will be told to just add an "s". I like this idea, and think that it would make getting started with OCaml and its libraries much easier for new users. > > A few switches such as -only unix,pcre should be added to ocamlcs to prevent it > from linking it everything if this is a concern. If ocamlfind were included as a standard part of the community OCaml distribution, then I think it would ease this process significantly. The standard set of libraries and syntax extensions could be checked against the proposed extra switches (-onlylibs/-exceptlibs/-libs) and used accordingly. The user would only need to know the ocamlfind name of the library they wish to include/exclude. The script would not have to keep track of including or excluding the proper directories for each new library which comes along in the ocaml(c|opt) search path since ocamlfind takes care of this. I think ocamlfind/findlib supports syntax extension packages as well - if it does then these could be handled in the same way. Hez -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science