Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-03-05 (12:36) |
From: | Bünzli_Daniel <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries |
Le 5 mars 08 ŕ 12:41, Alain Frisch a écrit : > Some of the issues that need to be addressed: [...] I will add : - What's the relation of this project to the package distribution system we talked some weeks ago ? I have absolutely no interest in this "Batteries included" thing, I like to select the packages I use and have an absolute distaste for pre-processor hacks. I think priority should go in simplifying/ standardizing module distribution/construction and their dependencies accross platforms. Good packages will eventually emerge from this system and you may then flag some of them as Duracell® packages or what not. But a developer-oriented, non-monolithic package distribution mechanism needs to be devised first. This discussion seems premature to me, it already calls for too much infrastructure, agreeement and manpower. I also suspect that with an easy to use distribution system this "Batteries included" thing just won't be necessary. Best, Daniel