Browse thread
OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-03-04 (21:14) |
From: | Hezekiah M. Carty <hcarty@a...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: OSR - "Batteries included" - Standardizing syntax extensions and extra libraries |
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:55 PM, David Teller <David.Teller@univ-orleans.fr> wrote: > I believe we souldn't live without > * open_in > * some list/array/stream/... comprehension (mine or another one, > preferably ExtLib-aware). I agree wholeheartedly with the inclusion of those syntax extensions as standard. I know they would help clean up a lot of my own code. However, I think that the libraries and syntax extensions to include by default should be in a separate thread to help maintain focus. Particularly given that there is some (initial) agreement on this particular OSR proposal. Hez -- Hezekiah M. Carty Graduate Research Assistant University of Maryland Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science