Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Canonical Set/Map datastructure?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Canonical Set/Map datastructure?
On Wednesday 05 March 2008 17:27:38 Alain Frisch wrote:
> Patricia trees work fine when the set elements can easily be represented
> as strings of bits.
> ...
>   structural equality = physical equality = set equality

This is very interesting. What are the disadvantages? I'm guessing: slow value 
creation for small values and heavy memory consumption.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e