Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: David Teller <David.Teller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
We can do that in OCaml, actually. I've seen at least three versions of
this in the Net, one of them by me. Plus it also works with streams,
arrays, etc.

On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:32 -0700, Arthur Chan wrote:
> The python syntax goes further than just the "in" bit, in fact.  They
> can do list comprehensions like [for x in blah if f(x)].  Now every
> functional guru will recognize this immediately as the bastardization
> of List.filter.  While it'd be nice to have that, I come across
> List.filter much less than List.exists/mem.
> Whatever....  it's just a minor quibble, but this thread was about
> syntax extensions, after all.

David Teller
 Security of Distributed Systems
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.