Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] The closing gap (warning: long, inflammatory rant)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Dario Teixeira <darioteixeira@y...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The closing gap (warning: long, inflammatory rant) |
Hi,
> Now data center owners love Ruby-based apps, since you need 60 servers to do
> 300 requests/second.
Is this hyperbole or hard numbers? Since I finally managed to use natdynlink
on an AMD64 machine (see Alain Frisch's today's message to this list), I ran
some simple benchmarks on a dummy Ocsigen application generating dynamic pages.
The results were more than good enough for my purposes, though I can't really
compare them with other languages/frameworks:
http://nleyten.com/2008/04/21/simple-benchmarks-on-the-ocsigen-server.aspx
Could Ocsigen be a killer app for Ocaml? Should we think of setting up
a simple "web framework shootout"? (Though personally I think the
advantages of Ocsigen go way beyond speed).
Cheers,
Dario Teixeira
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html