Browse thread
[OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ? |
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:53:36PM +0200, Berke Durak wrote: > We absolutely need a standard serialization solution. > > I'm thinking of Sexplib of course but it could be another one. The reason > it must be standard is that it's difficult to provide > serialization/deserialization functions outside the imlementation. It isn't though. There are several serialization modules (sexplib, deriving, ...), all of them are packaged up so using them is a simple 'apt-get' away. > So Sexplib should be a standard extension, or better, it should be included > in the compiler and used for the .cmo/.cmi/.cmxa files. Why? Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat