Browse thread
[OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Peng Zang <peng.zang@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ? |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ahh, sounds good. Thanks, Peng On Friday 25 April 2008 11:04:35 am David Teller wrote: > The current plans are to have two sets of extensions inside Batteries > Included: > * a few will be opened by default > * some others will just be part of the distribution, with instructions > in a common format, regarding how to activate & use them > > In either case, we will probably have a slightly customized ocamlbuild > which doesn't need special plug-ins for these extensions (that's part of > Edgar's side of the work). > > Cheers, > David > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 09:57 -0400, Peng Zang wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thursday 24 April 2008 01:05:44 pm Dario Teixeira wrote: > > > Remember the recent thread about ocamlbuild+findlib+camlp4 and the OSR > > > about standardising naming conventions for syntax extensions [1]. > > > Using a special ocamlbuild plugin [2], the barrier to using syntax > > > extensions is so low that you can almost consider them as standard > > > language features. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIEgLJfIRcEFL/JewRAjfWAKDQ9n50OG86N0qtebNzkpDeGWxBwgCePXKs Q6pxZYriFE2xlATVe1FTShw= =bufD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----