Browse thread
[OSR] Standard syntax extensions ?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-04-24 (20:53) |
From: | Berke Durak <berke.durak@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [OSR] Standard syntax extensions ? |
We absolutely need a standard serialization solution. I'm thinking of Sexplib of course but it could be another one. The reason it must be standard is that it's difficult to provide serialization/deserialization functions outside the imlementation. So Sexplib should be a standard extension, or better, it should be included in the compiler and used for the .cmo/.cmi/.cmxa files. -- Berke Durak