Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] The closing gap (warning: long, inflammatory rant)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-04-21 (21:06) |
From: | Arnaud Spiwack <Arnaud.Spiwack@l...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The closing gap (warning: long, inflammatory rant) |
> Thanks for the straw man argument there. Garbage collectors and _not_ > using threads both improve the safety of the language. > This might depend on what kind of thread interface you are provided with. Of course it's never easy to work with non-determinism, but if I take jocaml for instance, which gives you a process (in the sense of pi-calculus) interface to threads, and it makes it probably rather safe actually, possibly stronger safety when dealing with multiple processes (or UI threads possibly) than doing things with low-level primitves like fork and such.