Browse thread
[Caml-list] Operators for Int64 and Int32
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Thomas <david_hd@y...> |
| Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Operators for Int64 and Int32 |
For that matter, if the section is small enough, and
thus the declarations obviously associated, you could
even reuse +, -, *, etc. Of course, this forbids
doing any operations on regular ints in that scope.
--- David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com> wrote:
> (* other, non-Int64/32 code *)
>
> let ( +^^ ) a b = ...
> and ( -^^ ) a b = ...
> ...
> in
> (*
> * A block of code of reasonable length that makes
> * extremely dense use of the above operators.
> *)
>
> (* Perhaps more non-Int64/32 code *)
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com