Browse thread
[Caml-list] Operators for Int64 and Int32
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2008-04-03 (19:00) |
From: | David Thomas <david_hd@y...> |
Subject: | RE: [Caml-list] Operators for Int64 and Int32 |
For that matter, if the section is small enough, and thus the declarations obviously associated, you could even reuse +, -, *, etc. Of course, this forbids doing any operations on regular ints in that scope. --- David Allsopp <dra-news@metastack.com> wrote: > (* other, non-Int64/32 code *) > > let ( +^^ ) a b = ... > and ( -^^ ) a b = ... > ... > in > (* > * A block of code of reasonable length that makes > * extremely dense use of the above operators. > *) > > (* Perhaps more non-Int64/32 code *) ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com