Browse thread
Where's my non-classical shared memory concurrency technology?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Raoul Duke <raould@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Where's my non-classical shared memory concurrency technology? |
> If the answer is STM, please show me some non-trivial application that > uses it, preferably > in an impure language. yes, that would be interesting to see. presumably the example would have to come from Haskell, Clojure, or classically some SQL database? i am under the impression that STM is harder to optimize since generally you don't know what the transactions collided on. whereas with a "hot lock" you can see precisely what code uses that lock and what it locks.