Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Jon Harrop <jon@f...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml sucks
On Friday 09 May 2008 14:00:52 you wrote:
> Jon Harrop skrev:
> > . Parallelism is for performance and performance
> >
>  >   requires mutable data structures.
>
> I disagree. SMP Erlang has no mutable data structures,
> but achieves very good scalability anyway.

Scalability != performance. For CPU intensive tasks, Erlang is uniformly slow.

-- 
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e