Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml sucks |
On Friday 09 May 2008 14:00:52 you wrote: > Jon Harrop skrev: > > . Parallelism is for performance and performance > > > > requires mutable data structures. > > I disagree. SMP Erlang has no mutable data structures, > but achieves very good scalability anyway. Scalability != performance. For CPU intensive tasks, Erlang is uniformly slow. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e