Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml sucks |
> 1. Lack of Parallelism: Yes, this is already a complete show stopper. Why can't you just fork off enough processes to cover each core? > 5. Strings: pushing unicode throughout a general purpose language is a > mistake, IMHO. This is why languages like Java and C# are so slow. I wrote an entire wiki in OCaml, it's UTF-8 clean throughout and demonstrably handles German, French, Italian, Japanese, Korean and Chinese (http://www.ocaml-tutorial.org/). I wrote another Japanese website in OCaml. To do it, I just treated strings as UTF-8. The only UTF-8-specific code in the whole thing was tiny, I think a UTF-8-sensitive string truncation function, and a little bit of collation (mostly handled by the database, but could easily have been done using Camomile). My conclusion: UTF-8 is easy. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat