Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Richard Jones <rich@a...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml rocks |
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:01:03AM +0200, Berke Durak wrote: > But you are saying in the README that values in the ancient heap have some > limitations, namely no ad-hoc polymorphic primitives. You misunderstand this limitation, but anyway ... > So we need a function to copy back an ancient value in the heap so > that it can be used normally Should you want to copy a value back to the heap (almost always unnecessary), you can just copy it like you would any other value. Rich. -- Richard Jones Red Hat