Browse thread
Re: Why OCaml sucks
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Charles Forsyth <forsyth@t...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: Why OCaml rocks |
> Message > passing is fine for concurrent applications that are not CPU bound or for > distributed computing but it is not competitive on today's multicore machines > and will not become competitive in the next decade. i don't understand any of this. >2. How do we avoid excessive copying? What if each parallel thread only >requires part of a data structure, should we dissect the data structure to >alleviate message passing? this seems to suggest that message passing implies serialising the data structure. perhaps i missed something, though.